CONVENTION BETWEEN

Income from Debt-Claims 1.  Income from debt-claims arising in a Contracting State and paid to a resident of the other Contracting State may be taxed in that other Contracting State. 2.  However, such income from debt-claims may also be taxed in the Contracting State in which it arises and according to the laws of that Contracting State, but if the beneficial owner of such income is a resident of the other Contracting State, the tax so charged shall not exceed 5 per cent of the gross amount of such income. The competent authorities of the Contracting States shall by mutual agreement settle the mode of application of this limitation. 3.  Income from debt-claims arising in a Contracting State and paid to the Government of the other Contracting State shall be taxable only in that other Contracting State. For the purposes of this paragraph, the term ”Government” shall include: a)  in the case of Georgia: i)  the Government, administrative subdivisions or local authorities; ii)  the National Bank of Georgia; and iii)  any other entity wholly owned by the Government; b)  in the case of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: i)  the Saudi Arabia Monetary Agency (SAMA); ii)  the Saudi Fund for Development; iii)  the Public Investment Fund; iv)  the Public Pension Agency; v)  the General Organization for Social Insurance, and vi)  any other entity wholly owned by the Government. 4.  The term “Income from Debt-Claims” as used in this Article means income from debt-claims of every kind, whether or not secured by mortgage and whether or not is carrying a right to participate in the debtor’s profits, and in particular, income from government securities and income from bonds or debentures, including premiums and prizes attaching to such securities, bonds or debentures. Penalty charges for late payment shall not be regarded as income from debt-claims for the purpose of this Article. 5.  The provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article shall not apply if the beneficial owner of the income from debt-claims, being a resident of a Contracting State, carries on business in the other Contracting State in which the income from debt-claims arises, through a permanent establishment situated therein, or performs in that other State independent personal services from a fixed base situated therein, and the debt-claim in respect of which such income is paid is effectively connected with such permanent establishment or fixed base. In such case, the provisions of Article 7 or Article 14, as the case may be, shall apply. 6.  Income from debt-claims shall be deemed to arise in a Contracting State when the payer is a resident of that State. Where, however, the person paying such income, whether he is a resident of a Contracting State or not, has in a Contracting State a permanent establishment or a fixed base in connection with which the indebtedness on which such income is paid was incurred, and such income is borne by such permanent establishment or fixed base, then such income shall be deemed to arise in the State in which the permanent establishment or fixed base is situated. 7.  Where, by reason of a special relationship between the payer and the beneficial owner or between both of them and some other person, the amount of the income from debt-claims, having regard to the debt-claim for which it is paid, exceeds the amount which would have been agreed upon by the payer and the beneficial owner in the absence of such relationship, the provisions of this Article shall apply only to the last-mentioned amount. In such case, the excess part of the payments shall remain taxable according to the laws of each Contracting State, due regard being had to the other provisions of this Agreement.