File0001
Para. 6.4.4Status unknownSaudi ArabiaRegulation
Issued by Saudi Data & AI Authority / NDMO
Integrate cryptographic hashing and blockchain technology to create immutable records of the
original content**. These tools should enable the verification of content integrity, ensuring that any
alterations are detected and traced back to the source.
6.3.3 Apply visible, tamper-resistant watermarks (e.g., steganography) to all deepfake content to
ensure its synthetic nature is identifiable across platforms*. In creative contexts where synthetic
media is disclosed (e.g., in production credits), watermarks may be omitted. Ensure watermarks
are durable across formats.
6.3.4 Implement robust version control systems for all documentation, ensuring all changes are
tracked, recorded, and easily traceable.
(AI Ethics Principles – Principle 7)
. (AI Ethics Principles – Principle 7)
(AI Ethics Principles – Principle 5; Anti-Cyber Crime Law Article 3)
(AI Ethics Principles – Principle 7)
*Content creators should disclose the use of deepfake technology: Provide disclaimers in the content’s description, credits, or accompanying materials, explain
ing that deepfake technology was used. These disclosures should be visible and accessible, ensuring audiences are aware of the synthetic nature of the content
-Labelling content directly, using on-screen indicators or text at the start or end of the content, to inform viewers that synthetic media was used.
**Additionally, content creators could use metadata to label deepfake content, specifying the original creator and any subsequent modifications. This ensures
clear attribution and responsibility for each version of the content. Further, content creators are encouraged to maintain an ownership log that records each
instance of shared or remixed content, documenting any modifications and identifying responsible parties. This log aids in tracking the evolution of content and
establishes accountability.
(AI Ethics Principles – Principle 6)
6.4 Accountability and Responsibility
Deepfakes Guidelines: Mitigating risks while fostering innovation
Effective regulation of deepfake technology is crucial to safeguard against privacy and security risks.
Regulators can enforce a range of measures to minimize risks, however, regulation should also focus on
unlocking the benefits of deepfakes.
This section aims to ensure that deepfakes are regulated while enabling potential benefits
7. Guidance for Regulators
7.1.1 Platforms should implement mechanisms for reporting harmful deepfake content and review flagged
material promptly based on its risk. High-risk cases, such as finance, politics, or impersonation, should be
prioritized, while low-risk or educational content may allow for longer review periods.
7.1.2 Regularly monitor these platforms to ensure compliance with directives and impose penalties for
failure to act on identified harmful content.
7.2.1 Conduct thorough assessments of the deepfake technologies being used or approved for use within
the country. This includes reviewing the algorithms, data sources, and ethical considerations in the devel
opment of such technologies.
7.2.2 Develop a formal approval process for deepfake technologies, ensuring they meet established ethi
cal, legal, and technical standards before being deployed or used commercially.
7.2.3 Develop specific risk assessment frameworks for government entities that will use or approve deep
fake technologies.
7.2.4 Develop and enforce set standards for producing generative content, such as those outlined by the
Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA), to ensure transparency and accountability in the
creation and dissemination of deepfake and other AI-generated media.
7.2 Risk Assessment and Approval Processes
7.1 Platform Regulation and Monitoring
Deepfakes Guidelines: Mitigating risks while fostering innovation
The Arabic text is the legally binding version. The English translation is provided for guidance only.
Freshness not yet recorded