Review a contract
From 3 creditsWhat you get:A clause-by-clause risk map (🟢/🟡/🔴), each flag with a cited basis.
You provide: a contract (PDF, DOCX or pasted text)
Upload or paste a document and run a Saudi-law service on it — contract review, NDA triage, DPA review, claim charts and more. Cited to the governing instrument, with verify flags.
Run a curated sequence of services in one pass — from intake to draft.
Build the chronology, map the claim, draft the demand, then language-check it — for litigators opening a new dispute.
Assemble a dated chronology, then a deposition outline — for litigators readying for a hearing.
Grid-review the document set, then produce a privilege log — for litigation teams running discovery.
Review a contract, draft a negotiation counter, then audit its defined terms for consistency.
Tabular review, issue extraction, then a closing checklist.
Screen the offer, then classify the worker.
Triage an NDA, then draft a counter-redline — for in-house teams clearing routine confidentiality agreements.
Trace the amendment history, extract the renewal dates, then re-review the in-force terms — for in-house counsel auditing a live contract.
Review regulatory readiness, vet the marketing claims, then triage the data use — for founders shipping a product.
Review the open-source licenses, then surface the obligation gaps — for product teams shipping OSS-dependent software.
Clear the mark for conflicts, then draft a cease-and-desist — for founders protecting a brand or asset.
Triage freedom-to-operate risk, then check launch readiness — for founders clearing a product before release.
DPA review, a privacy impact assessment, then a gap list.
Triage the request for PDPL risk, then draft the response within the statutory window — for privacy teams answering a data-subject request.
Diff the policy against the requirements, surface the gaps, then redraft it — for compliance teams updating an internal policy.
Triage the AI use-case, generate an impact assessment, then surface the governance gaps — for teams governing an AI system under SDAIA principles.
Review the vendor AI agreement, then review its data-processing terms — for teams onboarding an AI vendor.
Screen riba/gharar, review compliance, redraft, then Arabic-proofread the result.
Review the Islamic finance instrument, screen it for riba and gharar, then find the fatwa basis — for teams auditing a Sharia-compliant product.
Compare the madhabs, gather the daleel, then draft a structured Sharia opinion — for scholars and counsel forming a considered ruling.
What you get:A clause-by-clause risk map (🟢/🟡/🔴), each flag with a cited basis.
You provide: a contract (PDF, DOCX or pasted text)
What you get:A verdict — standard / negotiate / reject — with the riskiest terms surfaced.
You provide: an NDA
What you get:An ordered timeline: what each amendment did and the in-force position.
You provide: an instrument and its amendments
What you get:The term, auto-renewal trigger, notice window and the explicit cancel-by date.
You provide: a contract with a term clause
What you get:A counter-redline plus an internal issues list (draft, gated before sending).
You provide: a counterparty redline + your positions
What you get:A due-diligence grid, one row per document, with uncited-cell flags.
You provide: a set of deal documents
What you get:The diligence issues a document raises, ranked, each cited.
You provide: a diligence document
What you get:The closing checklist + conditions precedent from a term sheet.
You provide: a term sheet or deal document
What you get:Each cause-of-action element mapped to its evidence, with gaps flagged.
You provide: a complaint or case file
What you get:A dated chronology of the events, each citing its source.
You provide: case documents
What you get:A demand letter drafted from your facts (draft, gated before sending).
You provide: the facts + the amount claimed
What you get:A deposition outline + question set from the case documents.
You provide: case documents + the witness
What you get:A privilege log with a cited basis for each withheld document.
You provide: a document set
What you get:A Labor-Law verdict: ground, notice and end-of-service — cited.
You provide: a termination decision or letter
What you get:An offer / contract reviewed against the Labor Law, cited.
You provide: an employment offer or contract
What you get:Employee vs contractor, decided from the contract terms under the Labor Law.
You provide: a services or employment contract
What you get:A DPA reviewed against the PDPL, cited, with gap flags.
You provide: a data-processing agreement
What you get:A data-subject-access-request response, drafted within the PDPL window.
You provide: the DSAR + the data you hold
What you get:A privacy impact assessment for the described processing under the PDPL.
You provide: a description of the processing
What you get:A PDPL risk triage + the required safeguards for a data use-case.
You provide: a description of the data use-case
What you get:A mark or asset cleared for IP conflicts under Saudi IP law, cited.
You provide: a mark, logo or asset description
What you get:A freedom-to-operate risk triage for a product or technology.
You provide: a product or technology description
What you get:A cease-and-desist letter drafted from your facts (draft, gated before sending).
You provide: the infringing use + your rights
What you get:An open-source licence / SBOM reviewed for obligations and conflicts.
You provide: a licence file or SBOM
What you get:A product launch reviewed for regulatory readiness, cited.
You provide: a launch plan or product spec
What you get:Marketing copy reviewed for unsubstantiated or non-compliant claims, cited.
You provide: marketing copy
What you get:A policy diffed against a requirement set, gaps surfaced and cited.
You provide: a policy + a requirement set
What you get:The compliance gaps a policy leaves open, each cited.
You provide: a policy or compliance document
What you get:A redrafted policy that closes the identified gaps under the applicable regime.
You provide: a policy + the gaps to close
What you get:An AI use-case triaged for governance risk under the SDAIA AI ethics.
You provide: a description of the AI use-case
What you get:An AI impact assessment for the described system.
You provide: a description of the AI system
What you get:A vendor AI agreement / model card reviewed for governance & risk obligations.
You provide: a vendor AI agreement or model card
What you get:A Sharia-compliance review flagging each clause with a cited fiqh basis.
You provide: a contract or instrument
What you get:The four Sunni madhabs’ positions on the issue, with cited sources.
You provide: a document raising a fiqh issue
What you get:A riba / gharar screen of the instrument with a cited basis.
You provide: a contract or financial instrument
What you get:The fatwa or scholarly opinion underpinning a ruling, with cited sources.
You provide: a document stating a Sharia ruling
What you get:The Qur’an, hadith or ijmāʿ that support the ruling in the document.
You provide: a document stating a ruling
What you get:A structured Sharia opinion on the question, with cited daleel.
You provide: the question + relevant facts
What you get:A contract redrafted to remove prohibited clauses, cited (draft, gated).
You provide: a contract to make Sharia-compliant
What you get:An Islamic-finance instrument reviewed for compliance gaps, cited.
You provide: a murabaha, ijara, sukuk, etc.
What you get:The Sharia inheritance shares (faraid) for the estate and heirs, with the rules cited.
You provide: the estate value + the list of heirs
What you get:Grammatical errors that change legal meaning, each flagged with its clause ref.
You provide: an Arabic legal document
What you get:A clean, corrected Arabic version with tracked changes.
You provide: Arabic legal text
What you get:Diacritics added only where the vowelling is legally material.
You provide: Arabic legal text
What you get:Defined-term drift flagged — a term defined one way and used another.
You provide: a legal document with defined terms
Informational draft, not legal advice. The Arabic source governs. Runs on your uploaded document with generic standard positions, not your firm’s.